Legal Opinion

State v. Dakin

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1895PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Fifth Judicial District, Madison County. Information for larceny as bailee. The state’s demurrer to defendant’s plea of former acquittal was overruled by Showers, J.

1Opinion of the CourtPembertoN, C. J.

— The defendant was tried in the district court in Madison county, under an information charging him with the crime of grand larceny, and acquitted. At the trial it appears the evidence tended to show that the defendant was guilty of grand larceny as a bailee, if guilty at all. After the acquittal of defendant the county attorney filed an information against him charging him with the crime of grand larceny as a bailee. He was tried for the alleged stealing of money belonging to one Sarah McGary. He is charged with stealing the same money, as bailee, in the second information. Upon the filing…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Territory of Montana v. RobertsMontana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Territory of Montana v. StantonMontana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Territory of Montana v. MooneyMontana Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Watts v. SpencerOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Killhonic v. NussMontana Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Harris v. RamseyMontana Supreme Court · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API