Legal Opinion

Grunwald v. Bronkesh

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 22, 1993Published

1Opinion of the Court

131 N.J. 483 (1993)

621 A.2d 459

ABRAHAM GRUNWALD, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

NOAH BRONKESH, ESQ., INDIVIDUALLY, AND SILLS BECK CUMMIS ZUCKERMAN RADIN & TISCHMAN A/K/A SILLS BECK CUMMIS ZUCKERMAN RADIN TISCHMAN EPSTEIN & GROSS, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, AND JOHN DOES 1 THRU 4, DEFENDANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued October 26, 1992.

Decided March 22, 1993.

Philip R. Sellinger argued the cause for appellants (Sills, Cummis, Zuckerman, Radin, Tischman, Epstein & Gross, attorneys; Mr. Sellinger, James M. Hirschhorn, and Mitchel E. Ostrer, of counsel and on the briefs).

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Lopez v. SwyerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  3. Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. United Building & Constr. Trades Council of Camden Cty. v. Mayor and Council of CamdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Jacob v. Norris, McLaughlin & MarcusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API