Legal Opinion

Wampler v. Beinert

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 1923No. 17884PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPemberton, J.

On April 19, 1920, appellant commenced this action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained as the result of being struck by an automobile of respondent. At the time of the injury, appellant was a married woman living with her husband. In her amended complaint, which was served in No*495vember, 1920, she alleges that her husband has abandoned her and their three children, has been charged with the crime of family desertion and is a futigive from justice, and further alleges that the cause of action against the respondent is the only property of value belonging to the community.. One of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dority v. DorityTexas Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Marston v. RueWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Ostheller v. Spokane & Inland Empire RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Hall v. JohnsIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Day v. HenryWashington Supreme Court · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gadbury v. BleitzWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Togliatti v. RobertsonWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Gleason v. Metropolitan Mortgage Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1976
  4. Mayo v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  5. Dizard & Getty v. DamsonWashington Supreme Court · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API