Legal Opinion

Dizard & Getty v. Damson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 1964No. 36735PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dawson, J. †

Frank and Alice Damson, during the course of their marriage, developed a successful and prosperous construction business operated by Mr. Damson. Substantial community property accumulated. This stable period came to an end, when Mrs. Damson learned that her husband was unfaithful, and was supporting and maintaining a home for another woman. Whereupon, she moved from the family home and, in January, 1960, instituted an action for separate maintenance. By amendment in February, 1961, she sought a divorce. She was granted a divorce by decree dated June 22, 1961. The court divided the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Marston v. RueWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Togliatti v. RobertsonWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Oregon Improvement Co. v. SagmeisterWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Hanley v. MostWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Lanigan v. MilesWashington Supreme Court · 1918

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Griggs v. Averbeck Realty, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Dennis J. Britt, Trustee of Frank James Damson, Bankrupt v. Alice J. DamsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  3. Johnson v. Farmers Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
  4. In re the Marriage of WrightCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  5. Barer v. GoldbergCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API