Legal Opinion
Carroll v. Preferred Risk Insurance
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided June 4, 1965No. Gen. 50,046PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Murphy
Defendant, Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance Company, appeals from a declaratory judgment, entered in a nonjury trial, which declared that “the plaintiff is entitled to avail herself of the benefits” of an “uninsured motorists coverage” clause. Preferred Risk contends that the “third party” involved “was not uninsured.”
Plaintiff’s intestate, John Carroll, was insured under an automobile insurance policy issued by Preferred Risk. One of the coverages provided by the Preferred Bisk policy was known as coverage “IT” or protection against uninsured motorists. This clause provided that where the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Stipcich v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Campbell v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
- Western & Southern Life Insurance v. TomasunIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. First National Bank of DundeeIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
- Palmer v. Bull Dog Auto InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- International Amphitheatre Co. v. Vanguard Underwriters InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
- Carroll v. Preferred Risk InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
- Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance v. HitesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1970
- Sylvia Jacobson and American Cold Hearing Corp. v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1967
- Carroll v. Preferred Risk InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.