Legal Opinion

Ostler v. Retirement Board

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided June 15, 2017No. 20160220-CAPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHRISTIANSEN, Judge:

¶ 1 Neal K. Ostler petitions for judicial review of the Utah State Retirement Board’s order denying him pension benefits. He contends that the withdrawal of member contributions he made over the eourse of about 15 years should not have resulted in forfeiture of all 15 years of service credit he accrued. He further contends that the statute of limitations did not begin to run on his claim that he was eligible for other service credit, because he had not yet retired. We conclude that the Board correctly interpreted the forfeiture statute and that Ostler’s other claims…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bailey v. BaylesUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Jensen v. Intermountain Health Care, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Moss v. Parr Waddoups Brown Gee & LovelessUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Lockwood v. Geico General Insurance CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Perrine v. Kennecott Mining Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shipex v. BradyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2022
  2. Peerless Idemnity Insurance Company v. BrennanDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2021
  3. Telos Ventures Group PLLC v. ShortUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API