Pecos & N. T. Ry. Co. v. Cox
Court of Appeals of Texas
Appeal from District Court, Hall County; L. S. Kinder, Judge. Action by C. B. Cox against the Pecos & Northern Texas Railway Company and othl ers. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtFly, J.
At a former day of this term this court refused to consider the statement of facts and bills of exception, but a writ- of error was granted by the Supreme Court, and it was held that, because the trial judge entered an order in vacation extending the time in which to file statement of facts and bills of exceptions, it should be presumed that he had the consent of the parties, although the record is silent in regard to any such consent. The Supreme Court referring to a statute enacted in 1909, p. 352, First Called Session, said: “We are of opinion that the statute copied above did not require…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1892
- Morgan v. Hannah's LesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 1849
- Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. F. A. Piper Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1908
- Southern Pacific Co. v. GodfreyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
- Kuykendall v. CoulterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cook v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Public Indemnity Co. v. PearceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Eckel v. Camden Fire Ins. Ass'n.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- San Antonio Southern Ry. Co. v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Eckel v. Camden Fire Ins. Ass'n.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1928