Legal Opinion

Eckel v. Camden Fire Ins. Ass'n.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 21, 1928No. 9103PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank Eckel was asserting a claim against the Northern Assurance Company, hereinafter for convenience referred to as the Northern Company, for the sum of about $1,800. He had placed this claim in the hands of Mr. Allen Hannay, as his attorney, for collection, with instructions to handle the matter in his own way. In the early part of February, 1922, one Joseph P. Clark was the representative and local agent of the Camden Fire Insurance Association, hereinafter called the Camden Company, at Hempstead, Waller county, Tex., and at such time, and at all times since, Cravens, Dargan Roberts, a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. East Texas Fire Ins.v. CoffeeTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Quanah, A. & P. Ry. Co. v. GallowayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  3. Howard v. StahlCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  4. Field v. GantierTexas Supreme Court · 1852
  5. Foote v. O'RoorkTexas Supreme Court · 1883

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Medford v. Red River CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  2. Camden Fire Ins. Ass'n v. EckelTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  3. American Indemnity Co. v. Hidalgo CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API