Summers & Oppenheim, Inc. v. Tillinghast Stiles Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
PATTERSON, District Judge.
The plaintiff moves to remand the case to the state court. The plaintiff, a New York corporation, commenced suit in the New York Supreme Court against Tilling-hast Stiles Company, a Rhode Island corporation, to recover a sum in excess of $3,-000. Tillinghast Stiles Company did not seek removal to this court, but answered in the state court on the merits. Shortly afterward Tillinghast Stiles Company vouched in O-Cedar Corporation, an Illinois corporation, as a party defendant on a claim of liability over, under section 193 of the New York Civil Practice Act, and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Torrence v. SheddSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Kirby v. American Soda Fountain Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Texas Transportation Co. v. SeeligsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Habermel v. MongCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1929
- Bacon v. FeltU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Iowa · 1889
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brown v. Hecht Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1947
- Marshall v. Navco, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1957
- Henson v. EichornDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1938