Legal Opinion

Summers & Oppenheim, Inc. v. Tillinghast Stiles Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 2, 1937PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATTERSON, District Judge.

The plaintiff moves to remand the case to the state court. The plaintiff, a New York corporation, commenced suit in the New York Supreme Court against Tilling-hast Stiles Company, a Rhode Island corporation, to recover a sum in excess of $3,-000. Tillinghast Stiles Company did not seek removal to this court, but answered in the state court on the merits. Shortly afterward Tillinghast Stiles Company vouched in O-Cedar Corporation, an Illinois corporation, as a party defendant on a claim of liability over, under section 193 of the New York Civil Practice Act, and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Torrence v. SheddSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Kirby v. American Soda Fountain Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. Texas Transportation Co. v. SeeligsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. Habermel v. MongCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1929
  5. Bacon v. FeltU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Iowa · 1889

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brown v. Hecht Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1947
  2. Marshall v. Navco, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1957
  3. Henson v. EichornDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API