Legal Opinion

State v. Hodge

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 2, 1995No. 9410SC472PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGEE, Judge.

Defendant first argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a mistrial “when the State failed to provide defense counsel with notice that a fingerprint analysis had been performed on an evidentiary item and failed to provide defendant with such fingerprint analysis.” We disagree. '

N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-910 (1988) governs the regulation of discovery in criminal cases and empowers the court to apply sanctions for noncompliance, including declaring a mistrial upon a party’s failure to comply with this Article. G.S. 15A-910(3a). Although the court has the authority to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. State v. SilhanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. State v. HerringSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  4. State v. GainesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  5. State v. RandolphSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  2. Cameron v. Merisel Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  3. State v. PenderCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  4. State v. EllisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  5. State v. BraxtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API