State v. Hodge
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
McGEE, Judge.
Defendant first argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a mistrial “when the State failed to provide defense counsel with notice that a fingerprint analysis had been performed on an evidentiary item and failed to provide defendant with such fingerprint analysis.” We disagree. '
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-910 (1988) governs the regulation of discovery in criminal cases and empowers the court to apply sanctions for noncompliance, including declaring a mistrial upon a party’s failure to comply with this Article. G.S. 15A-910(3a). Although the court has the authority to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- State v. SilhanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. HerringSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- State v. GainesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- State v. RandolphSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Cameron v. Merisel Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- State v. PenderCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
- State v. EllisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- State v. BraxtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.