Legal Opinion

Parrish v. Camphuysen

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 1971No. 10444PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMERON, Justice.

This is an appeal from a jury verdict and judgment which declared that the plain tiff, Phelan Parrish, and defendant, Tony Camphuysen, were partners and ordered a partnership accounting.

We are called upon to determine:

1. Whether the jury’s finding that a partnership existed was supported by the evidence.

2. Whether the court’s finding that the partnership did not include defendant’s cattle operation in California, known as the Pala Ranch, was properly supported by the evidence.

3. Whether the accounting of the Special Master was clearly erroneous.

4. Whether the court was acting…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. McDonaldArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Bohmfalk v. VaughanArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  3. State Ex Rel. Morrison v. Jay Six Cattle Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Fernandez v. GarzaArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Reliable Electric Co. v. Clinton Campbell Contractor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. ChartOne, Inc. v. BerniniCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  2. Fowler v. Great American InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  3. Schritter v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Gangadean v. EricksonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  5. Siegrist v. CarrilloArizona Supreme Court · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API