Legal Opinion

Byerly v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 9, 1970No. Appeals, Nos. 412 and 413PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Cohen,

These are appeals from two orders of the Superior Court affirming orders of the Public Utility Commission. Two proceedings were brought before the PUC. In one B. R. Whitmer Sons sought to acquire by transfer the certificates of public convenience as a common carrier by motor vehicle issued to Charles Forney. In that action Byerly’s Service, Registered was the protestant. In the other action Byerly’s Service, Registered attempted to have the certificate issued to Forney revoked and cancelled on the ground that operations under the certificate had ceased because of a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Modern Transfer Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Hostetter v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. Paradise v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  4. Motor Freight Express v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. W. D. Rubright Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Dutchland Tours, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Gettysburg Tours, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Commonwealth v. Purolator Courier Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Samuel J. Lansberry, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Philboro Coach Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API