Norton v. Agle Automatic Can Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California
In Equity. Bill by Edward Norton and Oliver W. Norton against tbe' Eagle Automatic Can Company for infringement of a patent. On motion for a preliminary injunction.
1Opinion of the Court
HAWLEY, District Judge,
(orally.) This cause is presented to me upon a motion for a preliminary injunction, tbe respondent having been served with notice to appear-and show1 cause, if any it could, why the injunction should not be issued. Tbe suit is in equity for the Infringement of letters patent No. 267,014, dated November 7, 1882, granted to Edwin Norton for a machine for putting on tbe ends of fruit and other cans. Tbe respondent, in its answer, admits *931that it has made and used, and 'is using, can-heading machines which were constructed substantially in accordance with specification and…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Stearns-Roger Mfg. Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
- Southern Pac. Co. v. EarlCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1897
- Kings County Raisin & Fruit Co. v. United States Consol. Seeded Raisin Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1910
- Duff Manuf'g Co. v. ForgieU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1897
- Societe Anonyme du Filtre Chamberland Systeme Pasteur v. AllenU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio · 1897
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.