Legal Opinion
Walsh Services, Inc. v. Feek
Washington Supreme Court
Decided September 21, 1954No. 32655PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchwellenbach, J.
Respondents purchased an eighteen-year-old home in Seattle, in October, 1951. They desired to have it redecorated and remodeled before they moved into it. Mr. Feek consulted his friend, Roy Walsh, who stated that his company (the appellant) was engaged in that type of work. On two or three occasions, Walsh’s son, Eugene, went over the house, room by room, with Mrs. Feek.
November 7, 1951, Gene Walsh prepared and delivered to respondents a letter setting forth in detail the several items of work to be done and an estimate of the costs. The total estimate of costs to the Feeks, including tax,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Title Guarantee Trust Co. v. . Pam.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Hughes & Co. v. FlintWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Shaw v. Bula Cannon Shops, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1949
- Hitt v. SmallwoodCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1926
- Title Guarantee & Trust Co. v. PamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rosellini v. BancheroWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- Modern Builders, Inc. v. MankeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
- Frank v. FischerWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- Brower Co. v. Noise Control of Seattle, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1965
- Trane Co. v. Brown-Johnston, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.