Legal Opinion

Wynne v. . Heck

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1885PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Civil ACTION, tried on the report of the referee, Geo. V. Strong, Esquire, and the exceptions filed thereto, before Qudger, Judge, at August Term, 1884, of Wake Superior Court. The Court adopted the findings of fact and affirmed the conclusions of law of the referee, overruled the plaintiff’s exceptions, and adjudged the action be dismissed. From this judgment the plaintiff appealed. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The Court adopted the findings of fact and affirmed the conclusions of law of the referee, overruled the plaintiff's exceptions, and adjudged the action be dismissed.

From this judgment the plaintiff appealed.

The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion. The plaintiff alleged in his complaint that the defendant was indebted to him on sundry accounts in the sum of $679.48. This, the defendant in his answer, denied, and thus it became necessary for the plaintiff to establish his alleged debt by proper proof.

By consent of the parties, the whole matter in contention was referred, under the Code of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Abrams v. . CuretonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
  2. Willey v. GatlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Booker v. EverhartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Martin v. . Mask.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  3. Boykin v. Bank of FayettevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  4. Union Trust Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  5. Boyd v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1892

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API