Legal Opinion

United States v. Smith

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 11, 2008No. 19-1315PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McKAY, Circuit Judge.

Defendant appeals his conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 1623(a) for attaching a document he knew to be false to a motion filed in a federal district court under penalty of perjury.

Background

In February 2001, Defendant was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm. At sentencing, the district court found that he qualified for an enhancement under the Armed Career Criminal Act and sentenced him to a 210-month term of imprisonment. We affirmed his conviction and sentence on appeal. United States v. Smith, 33 Fed.Appx. 462 (10th Cir.2002).

In October 2003, Defendant…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Minnesota v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Maryland v. GarrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. United States v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. AhernCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2017
  3. United States v. CamposCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2009
  4. United States v. GriffithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  5. United States v. KiefferCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API