Legal Opinion
Bohr v. Schweiker
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 24, 1983No. Civ. A. 82-2282PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
TROUTMAN, District Judge.
Testimony adduced at a disability hearing convinced an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) that plaintiff was “disabled”, for a specific period of time, within the meaning of the Social Security Act. The Appeals Council, reviewing the ALJ’s decision on its own motion, reversed and concluded that plaintiff was not legally disabled. Plaintiff commenced this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and asserted that the Appeals Council improperly decided to sua sponte review the ALJ’s award of benefits. Plaintiff argues that the relevant regulation, 20 C.F.R.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Daniel P. Cotter v. Patricia Roberts Harris, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- George Dobrowolsky v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secretary, Health, Education, and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Batterton v. FrancisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Lionel J. Bastien v. Joseph P. Califano, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Miguel LOPEZ-CARDONA, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- Taylor v. HecklerDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1983
- Baker v. HecklerDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1983
- Ward v. HecklerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985