Legal Opinion

Baker v. Heckler

District Court, W.D. Arkansas

Decided August 26, 1983No. 81-3082PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

H. FRANKLIN WATERS, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff Dalton Baker seeks judicial review of a decision of the Social Security Administration’s Appeals Council denying his claim for disability benefits. Both plaintiff and defendant Secretary of Health and Human Services have moved for summary judgment. Plaintiff contends that (1) the Appeals Council’s decision was not supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole; and (2) HHS regulations found at 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.969-.970 (1983) precluded the Council from reviewing his claim. The Secretary argues that the Council’s decision…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Morton v. RuizSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. United States v. CaceresSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Hubert Brand v. Secretary of the Department of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dalton BAKER, Appellant, v. Margaret HECKLER, Secretary of Health & Human Services, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  2. Taylor v. HecklerDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API