United States v. Joan Anne Kerrigan, United States of America v. Alvin Gerson Levitt, United States of America v. Barry Berk
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Appellants Kerrigan, Levitt and Berk appeal from their convictions in the Central District of California for conducting an illegal gambling business in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1955. The case was submitted to the court upon a stipulation of facts. We affirm the judgments below.
Appellants raise seven issues on appeal, of which only one has merit. 1 18 U.S.C. § 2518(1)(c) requires a wiretap applicant to include “a full and complete statement as to whether or not other investigative procedures have been tried and failed or why they reasonably appear to be unlikely to succeed if tried * *…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Bartkus v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- United States v. GiordanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Abbate v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- United States v. SaccoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
4Cited by67 opinions
- United States v. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. VentoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- United States v. FeolaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- United States v. Louis John Ippolito, Michael Contino, Irving Schwartz, William Darnold, Lawrence Miller, Thomas Arrants, and Arthur Joseph NatoliCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. James M. McCoyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.