Northrop Grumman Corp. v. Goldin
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LOURIE, Circuit Judge.
Northrop Grumman Corporation appeals from the decision of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals denying its claim under a eost-plus-award-fee contract for payment from funds allocated to a “separate award fee pool.” Grumman Space Station *1481Integration Div., 97-1 BCA ¶ 28,843, ASBCA No. 48,719, 1997 WL 103316 (1997). The Board held that since NASA terminated the contract early, Northrop was not entitled to certain funds remaining in the “separate award fee pool.” Because the Board erred in construing the contract to preclude payment from the separate award fee pool…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gould, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Fortec Constructors v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Granite Construction Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Aydin Corporation (West) v. Sheila E. Widnall, Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
3Cited by31 opinions
- Banknote Corp. of America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Mantech Telecommunications & Information Systems Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- North Star Alaska Housing Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Textron Defense Systems v. Sheila E. Widnall, Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Franconia Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.