Legal Opinion

In Re RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 20, 2012No. Misc. No. 2007-0489PublishedCited by 8 opinions

This document relates to: All Direct Purchaser Cases.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on defendants’ motion to stay proceedings under Rule 23(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure pending resolution of their petition to appeal the Court’s order granting class certification. The Court heard oral argument on the stay motion on September 13, 2012. Upon consideration of the parties’ papers, the oral arguments presented by counsel, the relevant legal authorities, and the entire record in this case, the Court will grant the defendants’ motion as it relates to dissemination of class notice, and deny the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission v. Holiday Tours, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  4. Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Ass'n v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
  5. Kohen v. Pacific Investment Management Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Moore v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  2. Thorpe v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  3. In Re RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATIONDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  4. Farley v. Lincoln Benefit Life Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2024
  5. Fernandez v. RentGrow, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API