Legal Opinion

M.E.S., Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided June 30, 2011No. 10-92PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BRADEN, Judge.

I. RELEVANT FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY.1

On July 20, 1998, the United States Postal Service (“USPS”) issued a solicitation for the construction of a new post office in River-head, New York (the “Riverhead P.O. Project”). USPS Compl. ¶ 9. On August 11, 1998, pursuant to the terms of the solicitation for the Riverhead P.O. Project and the Miller Act,2 M.E.S., Inc. (“MES”) acquired Performance Bond No. 73 SB 103097863 BCM (the “Performance Bond”) from Travelers Casualty & Surety Company of America (“Travelers”). USPS Compl. ¶ 14. The Performance Bond…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Augustin S. James v. Louis Caldera, Secretary of the Army and Philip J. SchrockCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  3. Erickson Air Crane Company of Washington, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  4. Sierra Club v. EspyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  5. Quinault Allottee Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. M.E.S., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  2. Mitchco International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
  3. Mitchco International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API