Legal Opinion

State v. Schoffner

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1991No. 89-386PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gray

The defendant, Norman E. Schoffner, appeals his conviction of burglary following a jury trial in the District Court of the Thirteenth Judicial District, Yellowstone County. We affirm.

As a preliminary matter, we note that after the notice of appeal was filed in this case, the defendant’s court appointed appellate counsel filed a motion to withdraw as counsel on the basis of lack of meritorious appealable issues. Counsel’s motion was accompanied by an “Anders” brief which referred to possible arguments in support of the appeal, as required by Anders v. California (1967), 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. JeffersonMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. JeffersonMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Hagen v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. ReavleyMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. WilliamsonMontana Supreme Court · 1998

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API