Legal Opinion

Salmonsen v. CGD, INC.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 28, 2008No. 26475Published

1Opinion of the Court

377 S.C. 442 (2008)

661 S.E.2d 81

Charles SALMONSEN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Appellants-Respondents,

v.

CGD, INC., f/k/a Charleston Gypsum Dealers & Supply Co., Inc., Frank Crider, Raymond G. Wolford, Henry (Hank) Futch, and Harold (Hal) Futch, Respondents-Appellants,

v.

Parex, Inc., Respondent-Appellants.

No. 26475.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Heard October 17, 2007.

Decided April 28, 2008.

Mary L. Arnold and Justin O'Toole Lucey, both of Mount Pleasant, for Appellants-Respondents.

Joseph E. DaPore, Stephen L. Brown, Russell G. Hines, all of Young, Clement,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Jackie Kleiner v. The First National Bank of Atlanta, Hansell & Post, Richard Kirby and Richard M. Langway, George W. Morosani v. The First National Bank of Atlanta, Hansell & Post, Richard Kirby and Richard M. LangwayCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
  3. Frost v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  4. Gordon v. Microsoft Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  5. Mitchem v. MeltonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API