Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Eastham v. Young

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 18, 1968No. [No. 300, September Term, 1967.]PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, C. J.

Mrs. Eastham, a resident of Montgomery County, complains that she can not be sued in Anne Arundel County, as the trial court held she could be, to compel specific performance of a contract for the sale of real estate she owned in Anne Arundel County, and furniture and garden and boating equipment thereon, and asks us to free her from the toils of the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County.

Reversal is sought on two theories. Mrs. Eastham says that a suit to compel specific performance of a contract to convey real estate is properly brought against a sole defendant only in the county of his…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Zouck v. ZouckCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  2. Glenn v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1883
  3. McCormick v. St. Francis De Sales ChurchCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  4. Keen v. KeenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  5. Kisner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Auto Sales Corp. v. KoneskiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  2. McGinnis v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  3. Sindorf v. Jacron Sales Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  4. O'CONNOR v. MotenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  5. Prince Georges Properties, Inc. v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API