Hordyk v. Farley
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
UDALL, Vice Chief Justice.
This case came to us upon a motion for a writ of prohibition. We granted an alternative writ and ordered that briefs be submitted for our consideration.
Petitioners were defendants in a foreclosure action in Santa Cruz Count} Superior Court. Respondent, Southwestern Land Co., was plaintiff. An answer to the complaint was filed in which petitioners denied lawful execution of the note and mortgage, alleged failure of consideration, and otherwise generally denied the allegations of the complaint. Southwestern Land Co. then filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Marsin v. UdallArizona Supreme Court · 1955
- Stephens v. StephensArizona Supreme Court · 1915
- Arizona Conference Corp. of Seventh Day Adventists v. BarryArizona Supreme Court · 1951
- Heat Pump Equipment Co. v. Glen Alden Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Allan v. AllanArizona Supreme Court · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Taliaferro v. TaliaferroArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. MirandaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
- Huck v. HaralambieArizona Supreme Court · 1979
- Morgan v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Beckord v. District Court of the County of LarimerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.