Mendoza v. Murphy
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EDITH H. JONES, Chief Judge:
Plaintiffs Rick and Irene Mendoza appeal the district court’s decisions to retain supplemental jurisdiction over their state law claims against Defendants Dr. Alicia Murphy and Dr. Mariano Alen and grant summary judgment based on the Texas statute of limitations, which is not here superseded by the state’s constitutional open courts doctrine. Tex.Rev.Civ. Stat. Ann. art. 4590i, § 10.01, recodified at Tex. Civ. PRAC. & Rem.Code ANN. § 74.251. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
Rick Mendoza’s bladder was surgically removed in 2001 after Defendants diagnosed his bladder cancer as…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Shah v. MossTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Smith v. Amedisys Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Morrison v. ChanTexas Supreme Court · 1985
- Weiner v. WassonTexas Supreme Court · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by147 opinions
- Brookshire Bros. Holding, Inc. v. Dayco ProductsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Clarence Enochs v. Lampasas CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- Ivan Webb v. Town of Saint JosephCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
- Bluefield Water Ass'n v. City of Starkville, Miss.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Karen D'Onofrio v. Vacation Publications, ICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
142 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.