Legal Opinion
Clarence Enochs v. Lampasas County
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided May 17, 2011No. 10-50029PublishedCited by 237 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DeMOSS, Circuit Judge:
This appeal asks us to determine whether the district court abused its discretion by failing to remand the case to Texas state court after all federal claims had been deleted and only Texas state law claims remained. For the following reasons, we find that the district court abused its discretion when it denied Clarence Enochs’s motion to remand. We therefore vacate the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Lampasas County on each Texas state law claim, reverse the district court’s denial of Enochs’s motion to remand, and remand the case with…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Smith v. Amedisys Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Priester v. Lowndes CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- Brookshire Bros. Holding, Inc. v. Dayco ProductsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by237 opinions
- Ronald Heggemeier v. Caldwell County, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
- Jeff Simmons v. Sabine River Authority, etCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
- Tregg Wilson v. Mike TregreCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
- Watson v. City of AllenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
- Walter Powers v. City of New OrleansCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
232 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.