Legal Opinion

Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. Wagner

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided October 19, 1927No. 990-4852PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarvey, P. J.

The defendants in error recovered judgment in the district court against the plaintiff in error for the sum of $2,485 damages resulting from the death of Miss Nora . Wagner, alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the plaintiff in error. The trial was before a jury; and among the issues of fact which the jury resolved against the railway company, and upon which the judgment was rendered, was.that of discovered peril. The plaintiff in error contends that there is no evidence raising this issue.

Although the evidence is sharply conflicting in important respects, there is evidence…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. BreadowTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. FinnTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Houston East & West Texas Railway v. KopinitschTexas Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Higginbotham v. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  5. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. LankfordTexas Supreme Court · 1895

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Ford v. Panhandle & Santa Fe Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Thompson v. AndermanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Parks v. Airline Motor Coaches, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1946
  4. International-Great Northern R. v. AckerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  5. Texas & New Orleans Ry. Co. v. HartTexas Supreme Court · 1962

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API