Legal Opinion

Houston East & West Texas Railway v. Kopinitsch

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1925No. 4122PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mb. Judge BISHOP

delivered the opinion of the Commission oE Appeals, Section A.

The Court of Civil Appeals for the First Supreme Judicial District has certified to the Supreme Court the question as to whether the evidence hereinafter quoted presents for the jury the issue of discovered peril. The evidence is as follows:

“Mitchell, the driver of the automobile, testified:
“ ‘The accident happened, I would judge, between eight thirty and nine o’clock in the morning; at the crossing that I understand was at Mount Houston. At the time the train collided with said automobile at the crossing I was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Trochta v. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. of TexasTexas Commission of Appeals · 1920
  2. Dallas Consolidated Electric Street Railway Co. v. MotwillerTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Hines v. ArrantCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  4. Brown v. GriffinTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. FinnTexas Supreme Court · 1908

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Ford v. Panhandle & Santa Fe Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Houston & T. C. Ry. Co. v. StevensonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
  3. International-Great Northern R. v. AckerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  4. Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. WagnerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  5. Southern Ry. Co. v. WhaleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1936

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API