Fuller v. Still
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
1. This action was brought under the provisions of the act of Congress known as the Housing and Rent Act of 1947 (Pub. L. 129, 80th Congress). The administrative machinery set up to handle a decrease in rent under this act must originate by the Expediter (through Area Rent Director), on his own initiative or on application of the tenant, decreasing the maximum rent as provided in Section 5 (c), of the regulation. When such decrease is ordered, the landlord may, within a given time, appeal such order of the Area Rent Director to the Housing Expediter. And thus the administrative phase of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kelly v. Strouse & Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Clark v. BandySupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- Vickers v. Atlanta & West Point RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
- East Tenn., Va. & Ga. Railway Co. v. GreeneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
- Walker v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Crane v. DoolittleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Mitcham v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
- Ivy v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950