Legal Opinion

Ullman v. Guglielmi

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 17, 1934No. Civ. No. 9321PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

Appeals were taken from an order of the probate court settling the account current and report of the executor and from an order denying a petition for partial distribution. Both appeals are presented on the same typewritten transcripts.

Rodolpho Guglielmi, also known as Rudolph Valentino, a motion picture actor, died testate August 23, 1926. On October 13, 1926, the appellant herein was appointed executor and thereupon entered upon the administration of his estate. The pertinent portions of the decedent’s will, which was duly admitted to probate, provide: “FIRST: I hereby revoke all former…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In re the estate of MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Angelus Cloak Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. In Re Estate of WilleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. In Re Estate of PiercyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Estate of SchluterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Siemon v. Mortgage Investment Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Estate of McSweeneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. San Francisco Opera Ass'n v. FlickingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. Hustad v. ReedMontana Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Bank of America v. WillardsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API