Legal Opinion

Dietz v. Waller

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1984No. 17037-PRPublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLOHAN, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff-appellants brought an action in the Superior Court of Maricopa County against defendant-appellee Waller and defendant Centurion Boats, Inc. on the theories of strict liability, express warranty, implied warranty of merchantability, misrepresentation, fraud, and consumer fraud. At trial, Centurión entered into a stipulation with the plaintiffs and was thereupon granted a directed verdict. At the close of the plaintiff’s ease, the court also granted a directed verdict for Waller on all claims. The plaintiffs appealed.

The Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. OS Stapley Company v. MillerArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Shirley J. Lindsay, of the Estate of John Douglas Lindsay, Deceased v. McDonnell Douglas Aircraft Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
  3. Byrns v. Riddell, IncorporatedArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Rocky Mountain Fire & Casualty Co. v. Biddulph OldsmobileArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Cornell Drilling Co. v. Ford Motor Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Co. v. RidgwayTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial HospitalArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  3. DeWitt v. Eveready Battery Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  4. Souza v. Fred Carries Contracts, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  5. Diviero v. Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API