Legal Opinion
Herbin v. Hoeffel
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 20, 2005No. 04-CV-907PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
This case has been before us twice before. See Herbin v. Hoeffel, 727 A.2d 883 (D.C.1999) (Herbin I); Herbin v. Hoeffel, 806 A.2d 186 (D.C.2002) (Herbin II). At issue now is whether the trial court correctly granted summary judgment to the defendants Janet C. Hoeffel, the Public Defender Service for the District of Columbia (PDS), and Ronald S. Sullivan, Jr., in his capacity as then-Director of PDS. We affirm.
As pertains to defendant Hoeffel, appellant’s remaining claims, as set forth in his amended complaint, are essentially threefold: breach of fiduciary duty; legal malpractice, ie.,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Giles v. Shell Oil Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. ReddickDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Waldman v. LevineDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Herbin v. HoeffelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pietrangelo v. Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr, LLPDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Walter Blair, II v. DC & Thaddeus Modlin, Jr.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
- District of Columbia v. Remi BamideleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- Advantage Glass v. Sber Royal MillsSuperior Court of Rhode Island · 2010
- District of Columbia v. Remi BamideleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014