Legal Opinion

State v. Angulo

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 12, 1993No. 26816-3-IPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAgid, J.

Pedro Angulo appeals his convictions for first degree assault and possession of a controlled substance on the ground that his right to a speedy trial under CrR 3.3 was violated. We affirm.

Angulo was charged by amended information with one count of attempted murder in the first degree and two counts of possession of a controlled substance. He was arraigned on those charges on January 19, 1990, and remained in custody. Trial was scheduled for April 9 with a speedy trial expiration date of April 23. The April 9 trial date was continued to April 23 because both counsel were in trial on other…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. CampbellWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Roscoe v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. State v. TerrovonaWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Davis v. Globe MacHine Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. FladeboWashington Supreme Court · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. CannonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. CannonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  4. State v. TatumCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  5. State v. Heredia-JuarezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API