Legal Opinion

Miller v. LHKM

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1988No. S-1847, S-1867PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before RABINOWITZ, C.J., and BURKE, MATTHEWS, COMPTON and MOORE, JJ. COMPTON, Justice.

This controversy arises from the termination of a land development joint venture between LHKM, a partnership of surveyors and engineers, and Jo Ann Miller. It concerns an agreement by LHKM to pave a road. The principal issue on appeal is whether Miller is barred from litigating LHKM’s alleged breach of the agreement by not raising the paving claim as a compulsory counterclaim in earlier litigation involving the parties as co-defendants. The trial court entered judgment on behalf of LHKM. We affirm.1

I.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Malvo Ex Rel. Malvo v. J. C. Penney Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Mohr v. State Bank of StanleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  3. Georgia Hall and Edward Hall v. General Motors Corporation, Buick Division, Larry Buick, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  4. Tolstrup v. MillerAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Orville J. Augustin v. Rafig Ahmed MughalCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ellingstad v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  2. McGill v. WahlAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Ellingstad v. STATE, DEPT. OF NAT. RES.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Domke v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Andrews v. Wade & De Young, Inc., P.C.Alaska Supreme Court · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API