Legal Opinion
McMillan v. Rodriguez
Mississippi Supreme Court
Decided August 15, 2002No. 2001-CA-01090-SCTPublishedCited by 75 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1. Genaro Salinas Rodriguez (Salinas) and his wife, Maria Rodriguez, filed suit against Roger McMillan and J.A. Tucker on September 22, 1998. Their complaint alleged that McMillan and Tucker were liable for damages suffered by Salinas following an automobile collision with a Brangus bull owned by McMillan on Highway 365 in Tishomingo County, and Maria's resulting loss of consortium. On May 24, 2001, Tucker filed a motion for summary judgment. The case went to trial on June 4, 2001. After the jury was empaneled and dismissed for lunch, Tucker's attorney addressed the motion for summary…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- City of Jackson v. LocklarMississippi Supreme Court · 1983
- Heigle v. HeigleMississippi Supreme Court · 2000
- McCullough v. CookMississippi Supreme Court · 1996
- Sumrall v. Mississippi Power Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1997
- Clemons v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- Harrison v. Chandler-Sampson Ins., Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2005
- United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co. of Mississippi v. MartinMississippi Supreme Court · 2008
- Price v. Purdue Pharma Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2006
- Busick v. St. JohnMississippi Supreme Court · 2003
- Sanderson Farms, Inc. v. D. D. McCulloughMississippi Supreme Court · 2017
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.