Bailey v. North Carolina Department of Mental Health
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtMallard, C.J.
Plaintiff contends that the Full Commission committed reversible error in refusing to permit the introduction of additional evidence after this case was remanded by the Supreme Court.
In the opinion of the Supreme Comb by Branch, J., (272 N.C. 680), the court said:
“The Industrial Commission’s findings of fact are conclusive on appeal when supported by competent evidence, except for jurisdictional findings. This is true, even though there is evidence which would support findings to the contrary. Mica Co. v. Board of Education, 246 N.C. 714, 100 S.E. 2d 72; Teer Co. v. Highway Commission, 265…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Floyd v. North Carolina State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Nello L. Teer Co. v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Bailey v. North Carolina Department of Mental HealthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- MacFarlane v. North Carolina Wildlife Resources CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- McCulloh v. Catawba CollegeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Drewry v. North Carolina Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Thompson v. Lenoir Transfer Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Viar v. N.C. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- Thornton v. F.J. Cherry HospitalCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- Collins v. North Carolina Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.