Legal Opinion

Principal Mutual Life Insurance v. Baron

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided May 28, 1997No. 96 C 608PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BUCKLO, District Judge.

The defendant, Ellen Baron, was an insured “dependent” under a health insurance policy issued by the plaintiff, Principal Mutual Life Insurance Company (“Principal”). 1 Ms. Baron was injured by an uninsured motorist. Pursuant to the health insurance policy, Principal paid $51,859.99 to the health care providers on behalf of Ms. Baron. Ms. Baron sued her automobile insurance carrier, USF & G, under the uninsured motorist provision. The parties settled for $780,000, $300,000 of which was an initial lump sum payment with the balance to be paid…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Sulser v. Country Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Baier v. State Farm Insurance Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Meyer v. Marilyn Miglin, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  4. Lundberg v. Church Farm, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  5. Sundstrand-Sauer v. Estate of ScottAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bishop v. BurgardIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Peart v. District of Columbia Housing AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Mitchell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2012
  4. Thomas J. Knolmayer, M.D., Alaska Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, LLC. v. Charina McCollum and Jason McCollumAlaska Supreme Court · 2022
  5. Bishop v. BurgardIllinois Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API