Legal Opinion

State v. Alford

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1965No. 1435PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERNSTEIN, Justice. •

In his motion for rehearing appellant calls our attention to a reference which we made: “A plea of not guilty by reason of insanity”. This statement may be misleading. Despite the title to Rule 192, Rules of Criminal Procedure, “Plea of not guilty by reason of insanity * * * ” there is no such separate plea. The pleas permitted are listed in Rule 178, Rules of Criminal Procedure, and the only pleas that cover all facts in issue are “guilty” and “not guilty”. The proper forms for these pleas are given in Rule 179, Rules of Criminal Procedure. The rule in the case of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. AndersonArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Leonard v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1915
  3. State v. ReidArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  4. State v. BuckmasterArizona Supreme Court · 1963

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. DoddArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  2. State v. JenningsArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  3. State v. KennedyArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  4. State v. HurlesArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Department of Liquor Control v. SantucciOhio Supreme Court · 1969

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API