Legal Opinion

Burlington Savings Bank v. Rafoul

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 2, 1965No. 322PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKeyser, J.

The plaintiff, on the ground of mutual mistake, requests reformation of two fire insurance policies issued by the defendants, Westchester Fire Insurance Company and Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company. ■ It seeks to have the named insured in those policies changed from J. J. Inc. to Gerald M. Rafoul. Upon hearings and findings of fact, the court entered a decree reforming the policies and ordered payment of the agreed amount of fire loss. The case is here on appeal from the decree by each defendant insurance company. There being no exceptions or objections raised in defendants’ brief to any of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Columbian Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. BlackCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1929
  2. deNEERGAARD v. DillinghamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1963
  3. Neverett v. TowneSupreme Court of Vermont · 1962
  4. Milford Yacht Realty Co. v. Milford Yacht Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
  5. Burlington Building & Loan Ass'n v. CummingsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bilbao v. KrettingerIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Bourne v. LajoieSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
  3. LaRock v. HillSupreme Court of Vermont · 1973
  4. CASSANI v. HaleSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
  5. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1966

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API