Legal Opinion

Bunt v. Sierra Butte Gold Mining Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 2, 1891No. 168PublishedCited by 37 opinions

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gray

This was an action brought against a corporation of Great Britain by the widow and daughter of William -J. Bunt, citizens of California, to recover damages, under § 377 of the California Civil Code, for his death by the defendant’s negligence while a workman in its mine. The answer alleged, among other things, that his death was caused by his own negligence, and not by any negligence on the part of the defendant.

At the trial, the only witnesses called by’the- plaintiffs (except in proof of their relationship to- the deceased, and of his death) were the superintendent of the mine and a fellow…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Randall v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Schofield v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Gunther v. Liverpool & London & Globe InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1890

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Moore v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Southern Pacific Co. v. SeleySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Union Pac. Ry. Co. v. JarviCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1892
  4. Ruiz v. ClancySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
  5. Indiana Natural Gas & Oil Co. v. O'BrienIndiana Supreme Court · 1903

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API