Legal Opinion

Gunther v. Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 3, 1890No. 1367PublishedCited by 27 opinions

■ ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN- DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. In contract;'on a policy of insurance. Judgment .for defendant. Blaintiff sued out this writ of error. The-case is stated in tbe- opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gbay

delivered the opinion of the.court.

This was an action brought by a citizen of New York against a British corporation on two policies of fire insurance, datéd November 16,1877, and extended to July 15,1880, the one on buildings, and the other on fixtures, furniture and other personal property in and about the same.

Each policy described the principal building as follows: “The two-story frame hotel building, with one-story frame kitchen and two-story frame pavilion adjoining’ and communicating, situated on Gravesend, Bay of Bath, Kings County, 'Long Island; (it is understood that the above…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schofield v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Liverpool & London Insurance v. GuntherSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Robertson v. EdelhoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1890

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Mt. Adams & E. P. Inclined Ry. Co. v. LoweryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
  2. Ketterman v. Dry Fork Railroad Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Southern Pacific Co. v. SeleySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Escallier v. Great Northern Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Travelers' Ins. Co. of Hartford v. RandolphCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1897

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API