Roeper v. Monarch Life Insurance
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Keller, P. J.,
The court below apparently treated this case as if it were to be governed by the principles applicable to an action for damages for personal injury or wrongful death. There was probably sufficient evidence of causal connection between the accident suffered by plaintiff’s insured and his disability and death to warrant a finding that they were caused by the accident, within the rules applicable to actions for damages for personal injury and wrongful death. But this was an action on an insurance policy for accident indemnity and it must be governed by the specific…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hodgson v. BigelowSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Cockcroft v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Aland v. P-G Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Lubowicki v. Metropolitan Life Ins.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Brandeis v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
3Cited by10 opinions
- Lucas v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- R. E. Tr. Co. of Phila. v. Met. L. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Real Estate Trust Co. v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Kubacki v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Miller Et Ux. v. DierkenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.