Legal Opinion
Vogel v. City of Richland
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided May 12, 2011No. 28470-1-IIIPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
255 P.3d 805 (2011)
161 Wash.App. 770
Hans VOGEL and Dana Vogel, husband and wife, Appellants,
v.
CITY OF RICHLAND, a political subdivision of the State of Washington and Milo Bauder, and Jane Doe Bauder, husband and wife, Respondents.
No. 28470-1-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3.
May 12, 2011.
John Stephen Ziobro, Telquist Ziobro McMillen PLLC, Richland, WA, for Appellants.
George Fearing, Brian James Iller, Attorney at Law, Andrea Jean Clare, Leavy Schultz Davis & Fearing, Kennewick, WA, for Respondents.
SIDDOWAY, J.
¶ 1 Hans and Dana Vogel appeal the ruling of the Benton County…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Wenatchee Sportsmen Ass'n v. Chelan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Isla Verde International Holdings, Inc. v. City of CamasWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Watch v. Skagit CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Chelan County v. NykreimWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Chelan County v. NykreimWashington Supreme Court · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Durland v. San Juan CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- Northshore Investors, LLC v. City of TacomaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Ferguson v. City of DaytonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- Ferguson v. City of DaytonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- Graham Neighborhood Ass'n v. F.G. AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.