Legal Opinion
Northshore Investors, LLC v. City of Tacoma
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided April 30, 2013No. 42490-8-IIPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPenoyar, J.
¶1 — The parties and amici ask us to address important legal issues related to the city of Tacoma’s (City) denial of a significant rezone request. But because this lawsuit was not served on the necessary parties within the strict statutory time period, we reverse and remand for dismissal.
¶2 Northshore Investors (Northshore) submitted an application to the City for permits to redevelop North Shore Golf Associates’ (Owners) golf course. In the application, Northshore requested approval of the development’s preliminary plat, approval of a rezone modification, site plan approval, multiple…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Watch v. Skagit CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. BunkerWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. BunkerWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- Overhulse Neighborhood Ass'n v. Thurston CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
- City of Puyallup v. Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1982
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Durland v. San Juan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- Arthur Gresh v. Okanogan County and Mazama Properties, LLC.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Confederated Tribes & Bands of the Yakama Nation v. Yakima CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2020
- Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation v. Yakima CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- Durland v. San Juan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.