Gonzales v. Uber Techs., Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY, United States Magistrate Judge
Plaintiff Michael Gonzales brings this action on his own behalf and as a putative class action for Lyft drivers whose electronic communications and whereabouts were allegedly intercepted, accessed, monitored, and/or transmitted by Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc., Uber USA LLC, and Raiser-CA (together, "Uber"). Now pending before the Court is Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint ("FAC"). (Dkt. No. 38.) Having carefully reviewed the parties' briefing and having had the benefit of oral argument on January 11,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Kwikset Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Hill v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Kasky v. Nike, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Brodsky v. Apple Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2020
- Goldstein v. Costco Wholesale CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2021
- In re: Capital One Financial Corporation, Affiliate Marketing LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2025
- In re: Google Location History LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
- Mastel v. Miniclip SADistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.