Legal Opinion

State v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 18, 2013No. 08C49193; A151436PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals a judgment revoking his probation, asserting that the court erred in including in the judgment a requirement that he pay $230 in court-appointed attorney fees. Based on defendant’s admission to probation violations, the court revoked defendant’s probation and, at sentencing, announced its intention to impose a sentence of 36 months’ incarceration. The court subsequently entered a written judgment of revocation, which, in addition to the announced incarceration term, also required him to pay $230 in court-appointed attorney fees. Defendant contends that the term imposing…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bacote v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. JacobsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. TisonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  2. State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  3. State v. HurstCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  4. State v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  5. State v. KasperCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API