Legal Opinion

State v. Hurst

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 14, 2016No. 14CR16374; A159323PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant was convicted after being found guilty of two counts of violating a stalking protective order, both misdemeanors. At sentencing, the court announced that it would impose 12 months of formal probation, including, as conditions, community service, no contact with the victim, and counseling as directed by her probation officer. In the written judgment, the court also imposed a $200 fine and a $100 fee for bench probation, even though the court had not announced those additional financial obligations in open court.

On appeal, defendant argues that the trial court erred in denying her…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. TisonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  2. State v. OwenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API