Legal Opinion

Inamanamelluri v. Wells Fargo

District Court, W.D. North Carolina

Decided December 6, 2023No. 3:23-cv-00391Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:23-cv-391-MOC NAGASAIGOUTHAM INAMANAMELLURI, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ORDER ) WELLS FARGO BANK, ) COLLABERA, ) MITCHELL MARTIN, ) RANDSTAD USA, ) K-FORCE INC., AND ) APEX SYSTEMS, ) ) ) Defendants. ) THIS MATTER is before the Court on motions to dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint, filed by Defendants K-Force, Inc., Wells Fargo, Mitchell Martin, and Apex Systems, pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. Nos. 15, 19, 23, 26). I. BACKGROUND This matter arises from…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac Railroad Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
  5. Portia Bass v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Company, Portia Bass v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Company, Portia Bass v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API